The Christian Rights

Now, in regard to my proclamations having to do with pronouncing the beauty of the Christian religion (more specifically the Protestant Christian religion) and the manners in which we have conducted ourselves that are verily superior to the listed and various others, I have no shred of doubt that those who hold me in disdain and enmity—with such uncharacteristic wickedness—would accuse me of religious bigotry, or other horrid acts. But to be sure, what I am saying is not bigoted. Let us take a close look at the definition of bigotry, to ensure we get our facts straight (and it is facts my enemies fear, because once they see them, they are quick to anger in realizing the imbecility of their so-called opinions).

The New Oxford American Dictionary defines bigotry. The definition is:

obstinate or unreasonable attachment to a belief, opinion, or faction, in particular prejudice against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group

I shall address, owing to my infinitesimal and perpetual patience, this denotative mark as it relates to the accusation that I, again, have no shred of doubt shall be levied against me with no restraint of ludicrousness and extravagancy.

First, there is the topic to address that whether I hold unreasonable or prejudicial views as a result of a person's membership in a certain group. This is false. As I've stated, and as I'll continue to iterate, I hold negative and antagonistic views about the people I have ascribed, those who aren't Protestant Christians, as a direct consequence of the actions which they have committed, and the causes and choices to which they are continuously and ruinously devoted. This is the only and main reason, now and forever; so let it be heard and most synchronously articulated.

Then, there is the topic that whether or if, how, I believe that different followers of different religions possess different characteristics, especially so as to raise or distinguish one set of adherents better than the other. This is false, again. I do not believe that Christian people, or that any other group, are better, or worse, than any other; nor do I believe that we or any other group possess any special characteristics. My claims of difference and matters of specialty have solely to do with our conduct and our decisions that we, of our own free will, choose to commit. I do not believe, because it is patently false, that different adherents of religions possess different characteristics. They do not. Yet different groups, I have observed, thus far, choose to do different things. It is precisely that this free will is exercised that is used when they do bad and good things that makes my claim of denouncing the evil, and praising the good, so truthful, so strong, and so inseparable from the river of virtue I and my organization cherish.

So the claim doesn't stand. Bigotry is to think one people is better by mere membership, or to believe in qualities that pre-exist the human condition: neither of which I believe in because that is false, and those things are untruthful. I hold these beliefs, and know these things to be true about the people I have listed, because they choose to do these things, like we all have that equal and natural, good or evil, choice. Do not cast me as evil because I have observed the free will that all men possess, that some simply choose to exercise more prudently. That is not evil; no, it is the mark of a good man.

Therefore, my statement stands. Christian people do choose to behave better than others, at minimum generally speaking, and this decision that we exercise does make our group, in a human sense, better than others that choose not to exercise these same good decisions.