There's a difference between good and evil. It is black and white. That's not to say there's something that can have elements of right and wrong, except there is such a thing as ultimate good and its opposite. Acknowledge that, or begone. It's a good thing to be good. And yet, some people aren't, now here on Earth. Those of us would like to change that. What's interesting is that the worst people in the world are not those who are outright evil, nor certainly those who are good in the superlative sense, as much as any mortal can. The worst people are those who are neither good nor evil, the ones who are in between, who swear allegiance to a more fledgling sense of entity.

There are many passages and proverbs and ideas throughout culture and time that give this general sense. A very popular one is the idea that a half-truth is the worst of all lies. It has a lot of sense to it. The idea with that one is that a half-truth carries elements of truth, so it's more likely to be believed than a complete lie, therefore causing more harm. Pedestrian nonsense? No. In fact, it's not even limited purely to Western culture, although the idea is more developed in our regard, no doubt.

In I believe, and I could be misremembering, Hinduism or Indian proverbs, there's one proverb of them that questions: What man achieves perfection first? (Or what man achieves perfection with the Lord first?) He who loves God or he who hates God? And their answer, interestingly, is he who hates God, because he who hates him will think of him more often. Now, there is some truth to that, although it's vastly oversimplified, and largely untrue. People who show faith and goodwill toward God, thinking of him often, will achieve oneness far simply and more directly. But in some cases, there is some value to be derived from doing the outright opposite, but it must be done totally. This is not to blaspheme: the ultimate goal is oneness and goodness in Christ. And if you can do that directly, as many can, that's superior. Give me one moment.

It echoes with what Christ told us. In the parable of the Sower, and similar stories, there is the idea that we must listen to the word of Jesus in order to see the light, and grow. Those who hear the word but do not think of it, do not see it, perish. What do I mean by this?

The idea I'm putting forth goes back to a common Christian theme derived from those like Milton and Dante. It's not of them, but generally or commonly derived from them. I develop this idea further. It's that indeed, the worst of all sinners are not those who serve God, certainly, nor those who serve Satan, or evil. It's those who serve neither God or Satan, who serve something in between. Not necessarily themselves, as serving yourself is a form of the opposite of justice. It's people who do a bit of both. Those who are sometimes good, sometimes bad. Sometimes serve justice, sometimes serve selfishness. Those people are the worst. My idea, and this is commonly echoed across a lot of Christian sources or thinking, is that if you serve God, obviously that's good, you've already succeeded.

But if you ultimately and totally serve selfishness, you're the most selfish person there is, then eventually you will see the face of God. And you'll see justice, its light, and will be compelled to do good. Even Satan, as they say, once once an angel, and if you know Satan totally, you will see the light of that. And you'll choose to be with Christ, instead. The worst people, therefore, are not those who totally serve evil, because if they did they'd see the face of justice, as evil is justice warped. It's those who serve kind of justice, and kind of evil, because they see the face of neither justice or evil, and can never therefore see the face of God, and come to the light eternally, and be one with the Lord the Father Almighty. Make no mistake, I am not saying evil is good. It's not: my very testimony here is intended to get people to do justice. I am saying that even if you were totally evil, you'd see justice. People's mistake here, that I'm calling out, comes from being kind of evil, where they cannot see anything. But, obviously the better path is to achieve justice from the beginning, to do good in the beginning and end. That's my point.

I really do mean that. I can prove it with a simple example. John Locke made a great point in his Second Treatise. He was quoting somebody else. I'd like to borrow portions of it. If you are totally selfish, then you want to love yourself, and for everybody else to love you. In a very selfish manner. Now the best way to do that is to extend love toward everybody else because they, like you, perhaps, want to be loved. So if you selfishly want divine treatment, you must extend that to others. It's the only reasonable way to expect it from others. In this way, a purely selfish man very practically engages in the Christian ethos of peace, and mutual harmony just by wanting that extended to himself, and no other.

Now, if you are motivated by the desire to help others instead, then that's fine and actually better, and in the end that's what it will lead to in either direction. If you want to serve only yourself, or only serve others, then eventually that will lead to serving everybody, and serving God.

The worst sinners are those who are not totally selfish, and obviously not those who are totally selfless; but those who are somewhat selfish. For they see neither the face of God, nor the face of what once was with God in Satan. I am not advocating that people be selfish. I am advocating that for those who cannot see the light in other people despite trying their best, fine. Then be selfish. Don't hold yourself back. Be the most ultimately selfish person you can be. Don't care about other people, and curse them. Care only about yourself to the utmost and highest level. Don't care about yourself a little bit, but then be kind sometimes. No. Be kind never, and extend kindness and goodwill only to yourself forever and without any restriction. Because if you do, you'll realize the best way of doing that, I hope, is to extend goodwill to others, or you'll in some other manner hopefully see the value in yourself through such selfishness, thereby enlightening you to the truth.

The goal is to be one with Christ. To believe in him and do good works on his behalf. And the other things. We tell people to extend unmitigated kindness, to be good in all cases to achieve this belief and its manifestation. And you should. That, in my purview, is the better option; nothing I say should be inferred as a diminution of that fact. What I am saying is that for those who can't do that, then go the other route, and you'll wind up here anyway if you follow it through.

And I should make it clear: if you are already one with God, then stay there. Don't start committing evil to make yourself more one, or something. No, you've won. Be good, as you will it. This is for people who are not one with justice. If you are already, then you're good. If you are already on the path of light to there, stay there.