The Origin of Responsible Rights

I do not support feminism. Feminism is a construct which attempts to give women rights they do not have, and a means of expressing rights that are inappropriate. This is not to deny women the rights they do have. Women have the same rights men have. What feminism does, however, is argue that women have more rights than men, or that they are able to express these rights without the proper responsibility inherent to them. Let us begin from a detached perspective.

Women, at one point, did not have the right to vote. Feminists will sometimes use this as a starting point for why feminism is necessary. But they are mistaken. Women did not want the right to vote when it was given to them. Even more so, this is often not for the reasons many think. Women were not denied the right to vote on the basis of arbitrary reasons. And they did not want it when offered not because they thought they were incapable, which perhaps some thought so, but largely because they did not want to exercise the responsibilities that voting required to gain the right. About 90% of women or more, from the sources that are reliable from that period, did not want the right to vote. This was called the anti-suffragist movement, and it dominated. Again, that's 90% of women, when they were discussing giving women the right to vote.

But this is not for the reasons many or at least some think. Women did not want the right to vote because they did not want to exercise the associative civic responsibilities that came with it. Responsibilities that were required in order to vote. People forget that voting was not an immediate entity of possession like it is today. Men could vote, yes, they had a right, but they had to exercise civic responsibilities, willfully and of their own volition to gain that right. Men had to own land or property, they had to have a job, they had to sign up for the federal draft where they could be deployed overseas, and they had to sign up for the local fire brigade, which is what existed before modern fire departments, a local version of it. Men had to willfully sign up and perform these civic duties to exercise and obtain their right to vote. If you were a man but didn't own land, have a job, volunteer for the fire brigade or sign up for the draft, you could not vote.

Women did not want the right to vote, by and large, with exceptions, because they did not want to perform the civic responsibilities. Most women did not want to get a job, have to own property, sign up for the draft, and volunteer for the fire brigade. That's why they were largely against it. They did not want to be expected to volunteer for the fire brigade or sign up for the draft, under the logic that they should vote and therefore take responsibility to enact it. It's not that they didn't believe they had the right to vote. They just didn't want to be pressured into assuming certain civic responsibilities for voting if they were given that right under the same conditions men were.

Now, women were indeed given the right to vote despite the fact the overwhelmingly majority, over 90% according to most reliable reports, did not want it. This created a discrepancy for a time, because when it was implemented, in order to combat women's concerns, there was a time where women had the right to vote by default, without performing any civic responsibilities. To vote as a man you needed to own land, sign up for the draft, volunteer in the fire brigade, but women had the right to vote automatically. Later, this was expanded to give all people the right to vote without performing any civic duties, both men and women. But the point is, a core tenet of feminism that involves women being barred from participating in the civic process is untruthful. Women did not want the right to vote, and yet were quite actually given it anyway.

This erodes a lot of feminist talk right from the get go, by establishing the foundation of their argument is based on a misunderstanding of the dynamics of history and rights. No wonder feminism is so delusional, when they do not understand the nature of the rights that we all possess.

Now, feminism's problem is that it argues by virtue of such principles that women have more rights than they do, or that they need not exercise the responsibility and accountability that come with them. Feminism will commonly argue that women have "rights" to do many things that they are denied, but they list certain things that they A) either absolutely have the right to do that no one denies, or B) argue that they not only have that right, but need not exercise responsibility for it.

Now, I believe feminism is tremendously outrageous and logically untenable for a number of reasons. So strongly do I believe this that I will refuse to engage in deliberately, one-by-one dissecting its many fallacies like I would ordinarily do. I'm instead going to erode the very core of its principles like I have done, and render a better understanding of the history of men and women and the rights of people, as I once again have. I will say again: men and women have rights in a manner neither superior to the other and must exercise the responsibility associated with that.

This is something men know how to do. Men, we have a culture of holding ourselves accountable. We all kind of know this, and let's not kid ourselves. When a guy does something wrong or bad, other guys will hold him accountable. They'll say, "Hey, dude, that wasn't okay. You messed up. Don't do that again." We all do this as men because we hold ourselves accountable. I want to stress I do not believe this is something inherent to men. While there may be some psychological influence in certain people between the genders according to leading psychoanalytic research, the difference is only noticeable at the extremes and essentially negligible for the general population. This means, that no: I do not believe men hold each other accountable because they are inherently men and it's built into the genome or something. We hold each other accountable because we choose to do so. And we have a culture of it that taught and trained us. It's something we have done for many, many eons, for a long time, and so we learn to do it. When a guy messes up or exercises a right irresponsibly, he gets called out by guys.

Women don't have that same thing. There are some women who would hold some of themselves accountable, but by and large this same decision, and culture, does not exist. This is in large part because historically women did not exercise many of the rights and responsibilities that are common today for women to exercise, or attempt to exercise. Many of these rights and responsibilities were historically left to men, by the agreement of both men and women. As I demonstrated.

Women don't have that same culture and it's problematic. When a woman expresses a right or responsibility irresponsibly, she is not held accountable in the same way that we men hold ourselves accountable. This is a big problem, and feminism is a leading contributor to its severity. Women not only do not understand how to express these rights responsibly, but the feminism ideology, in its retarded nature, argues that women do not need to express these rights responsibly, that by virtue of being a woman they are not subject to that accountability. This is dangerous, and harms people at large by not taking accountability for harmful actions.

Men and other women need to stop this and hold women accountable for their actions, like we hold ourselves accountable. It needs to begin with us men in large part, because we know how to do this and do it all the time. We need to begin with the feminists who engage in such deranged thinking. We need to hold them accountable, because women need to learn how to responsibly exercise their rights if they want to engage in them. Men do not allow other men to irresponsibly engage in rights; we cannot let women do the same. Nobody can engage in the exercise of rights without understanding the responsibility that comes with expressing them.

Again, I'm not going to give examples because this movement is so baseless in its formulation from the foundation that I'm not going to humor it by unraveling each of its tenets. I'm just going to pull apart the main thread as I'm doing and that will be sufficient to crush it entirely.

All of what I'm saying, too, is rather well-understood. If you put it all together the conclusion is inevitable. Don't argue with me that men don't have a culture of holding ourselves accountable. We do. Please don't be silly. You can look at the way men talk to each other when we do something bad. Then, when women do something bad in regard to an exercise of a right that needs responsibility to be prudent and safe because it affects other people, women do not, by and large hold themselves accountable to the same extent. And feminists do not assist this. It's time for men to guide women in expressing these rights safely and responsibly when they wish to do so.

It may have been assumed that women would guide themselves, and that that would be appropriate because they function differently sometimes, but that hasn't been working and even worse was erroneous from the beginning. Men developed the knowledge of how to be accountable and responsible over thousands of years, and women are not going to invent it summarily in decades or centuries, nor should they, neither in practicality or of necessity.

So men need to guide them, and other women who are more lucid in their thoughts need to join in the assistance of proper exercise of rights and responsibility when it affects other people.

Many of these tenets are fairly obvious and cannot be debated. I'm merely synthesizing the conclusion by drawing them together. That's about it. I won't humor the movement by delving into examples. I've pulled it apart.